« September 2005 | Main | November 2005 »

October 2005

October 31, 2005

UPDATED: Call and Write the Republican Gang of 14, Ask That They Support the Alito Nomination to SCOTUS

OK. Now is the time. Let's work hard to get Judge Alito confirmed to the Supreme Court of the United States. President Bush has made the right decision to confirm an originalist for the court. We conservatives now need to put our money where our mouths have been. Call and email the Republican Gang of 14 Members and let them know that you want their support for this nomination. Hugh Hewitt is a great place to go for the best information about this nomination. He begins by including the contact information for the 7 Republicans of the Gang of 14:

Senator McCain: mccain.senate.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=Contact.Home
(202) 224-2235

Senator Warner: warner.senate.gov/contact/contactme.cfm
(202) 224-2023

Senator DeWine: dewine.senate.gov
(202) 224-2315

Senator Chafee: chafee.senate.gov/webform.htm
(202) 224-2921

Senator Snowe: olympia@snowe.senate.gov
(202) 224-5344

Senator Collins: collins.senate.gov/low/contactemail.htm
(202) 224-2523

Senator Hagel: hagel.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Offices.Contact
(202) 224-4224

Senator Specter: (202) 224-4254
specter.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactInfo.Home

UPDATE: Polipundit adds,

A phone call or a mailed-in letter is worth a hundred e-mails.

vadkins
QT Monster Blog Home

October 29, 2005

Rush Limbaugh's Able Danger Remarks from his 10/28/2005 Radio Talk Show

Rush Limbaugh's Able Danger Remarks from his 10/28/05 show:

Caller: Hi Rush, hey, I think this whole thing with Valerie Plame and Libby and all these people, this is just a big yawn. I can't believe that this has become front and center. I read your article last night in The Limbaugh Letter about Curt Weldon and I listened to his speech and read his speech the other day. And that's what I think should be front and center. That's where the big cover-up is. Man, this whole thing with Valerie Plame, it's going no where. Wasn't it CBS or ABC the day who did man on the street interviews and nobody even who Libby or Rove or anybody was? They don't really care about that stuff. I tell you what, if this Able Danger stuff ever got out into the public, that's what people would be interested in. What do you think?

Rush Limbaugh: Well, I agree with a lot of what you've said. But I think that they're both important. And we give the Able Danger story a considerable amount of time here just as we did Congressman Weldon in the newsletter which you so thankfully subscribe to, and you quoted it here. The Able Danger thing is going to not go away because Weldon's not going to let it go away. But I wouldn't downplay this business here of Valerie Plame. I can read my emails and I know that there are a lot of people who say, Rush, this is no big deal, we don't care about this out here.

Folks, it's important that you understand what's going on. The media has been totally scandalous in this, just as they have been after Hurricane Katrina. And they are attempting to get this president out of office. They are attempting to force this president to resign. They are attempting if they can to get this to go forward toward impeachment. They are trying to relive 2 events at one time-Watergate and the Viet Nam War. And it's an all out press. It is the whole Washington press corps and their allies in New York and Boston and so forth along the Eastern seaboard are totally invested in this now. I can't sit here and ignore this. I can't sit here...I know, I'm the one who tells you, folks, the mainstream press, they don't have the influence they used to have, and I'm fully aware of that. They're not going to be able to get away with this, but they can't just be ignored and laughed at, so we can't say, OK, let them do what they want to do because it's occupying the news cycle. And if I don't talk about this at some point you're going to find out who those people are and then get mad at me for not talking about it. But beyond all that, to me this is crucial. We have the criminal justice system here, which to me has got a big question mark on it. We've had 2 years of investigation now, and we potentially have indictments coming today, and not one of these indictments has anything to do with the original crime that's been committed here. I'm hell bent on making sure that you're armed and prepared to deal with what you're going to see when you turn on the media any night of the week or any weekend.

So we're not letting other things go by the wayside, and we're not forgetting other things. We're touching on all of these, some important things that we got into yesterday as well. And the Oil for Food scandal, I've got first up in the stack here. And as soon as I find out that this document release is supposedly imminent. Now that the prosecutor's handed up the first charges in the leak case, that means that he's given them to the judge. When you hand up an indictment, you give it to the judge. When an indictment is handed down it means that they come from the court and go out to the accused, the suspect. So the indictment's have been handed up and they are going to be here about 2:00 this afternoon. Whatever they are, we're still dealing with speculation. Don't for a minute think that this is irrelevant or unimportant because people don't care about it. You need to care about it if the mainstream press is going to try to conduct another coup d'etat if you will and force this president out of office or try at any rate.

End of transcript.

vadkins
QT Monster Blog Home

Able Danger Video Link List Updated

Here's an update to my previous post listing all of the Able Danger video links from Intelligence Summit:

I will continue to post updates to this video/audio list.

He Said, No No No No, We Don't Do Christmas No More

This parody from the Mason and Bill Show on Q105 FM in Tampa is great. (My previous post regarding the Hillsborough County School Board's killing of Christian and Jewish holidays for school students in that Florida county is here.)

vadkins
QT Monster Blog Home

October 28, 2005

Get the IRS out of your life

On Oct 26th, Senators DeMint (R-SC) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) sponsored a bill, S. 1921, the "8.5% Tax Reform Plan" which will eliminate all income taxes and replace them with a tax on new goods and services.  DeMint and Graham had this to say in a press release:

    “Our tax code is the number one job killer in America, and it must be replaced,” said Senator DeMint. “The 8.5% tax reform plan would pull the IRS tax code out by its roots and replace it with a system that is simple, fair, and revenue-neutral. It protects the poor, encourages savings and investment, and levels the playing field for U.S. manufacturers and exporters. This plan would ensure that every American is treated the same and that every business is given a chance to compete in a global economy,” said Senator DeMint.   

    “Fundamental tax reform is long overdue,” said Senator Graham. “If we want to prosper in the 21st Century global economy, we must reform our outdated tax system. The proposal sponsored by Senator DeMint represents a fairer and simpler method of collecting taxes. As a nation, it would make us more competitive in the global economy. Reform of our tax system is a debate our nation needs to have sooner rather than later.”

The tax reform bill:
   1)  Replaces Individual Income Taxes with an 8.5% Sales Tax
   2)  Replaces Corporate Income Taxes with an 8.5% Business Transfer Tax
   3)  Provides Poverty Protections
   4)  Helps Low-Income Americans Prosper
See the press release for more details.

It's time to get the abusive and intrusive IRS out of our lives. Just imagine how our economy could prosper if we shifted the money currently used for tax compliance to something productive. If you agree this is the way to go, please support Senators DeMint and Graham anyway you can.  Email your friends, email your representatives, write letters to the editor etc. If "We the People" get behind this, I believe we can make it happen.

Linda Liberty
QT Monster Blog Home

             

October 26, 2005

Florida County School Board Says No More to Good Friday And Yom Kippur

The Hillsborough County School Board-building private school enrollment-thousands of students at a time.

(TAMPA, FL) - The Hillsborough County School Board has voted 6 to 1 to eliminate all religious holidays from the 2006-07 school year calendar.  The move follows a complaint from one local Muslim who wants Islamic holidays recognized just like Christian and Jewish ones.  For the next school year, classes will be in session as normal on Good Friday and Yom Kippur.  Any student who wants to observe a religious day, can take it off without penalty.

Most parents who called into the "Mason and Bill Morning show" on Tampa's Q 105 say that's still not acceptable because those who take the day off are being penalized, based on the fact that they'll be a day behind the students who went to school on that day. Tom Gonzalez, lawyer for the school board, says adding religious days to the school year calendar was wrong in the first place.  Lawyer for Jennifer Faliero, the only board member who voted against the change, says Good Friday should stay as is because it's a secular holiday about the Easter Bunny, not religion.

December 25th is still covered by the politically correct, and strategically placed "Winter Break".  Local Muslim leaders worry Christians and Jews will blame them for loosing Good Friday and Yom Kippur.  They say that wasn't their intention.

Carrie Kirkland, Q 105 News

October 21, 2005

Able Danger Video Link List Updated and Updated Again, and Yes, Yet Again

Here's an update to my previous post listing all of the Able Danger video links from Intelligence Summit:

I will continue to post updates to this video/audio list.

Rush Limbaugh's Able Danger Remarks on His Radio Program Today

During the third hour of his radio program today, Rush Limbaugh discussed Rep. Curt Weldon's Able Danger speech late night on the floor of the US House of Representatives. This is a transcript of Rush's remarks:

Caller: I just wanted to get your thoughts on the Curt Weldon speech last night that I haven't heard anybody else talk about-Able Danger.

Rush Limbaugh: Well, you know, one of the reasons I took your call here and the reason you've been on hold for a while is because I was planning to get to it here in this half hour because I have audio sound bites of Weldon on the floor of the House last night talking very much about this Able Danger business. We've talked to Curt Weldon for The Limbaugh Letter. He is fit to be tied. People constantly say, Rush, how come you stopped talking about Able Danger. We haven't stopped talking about Able Danger. Nothing ever leaves the table here. When it comes back we're on it. We're on it, it's back. Weldon is convinced that the DIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon, is doing everything they can to destroy the career of this whistle-blower. He's been told that they destroyed all the evidence of Able Danger. He's learned now that there is another packet of evidence. Let's listen to the first sound bite, a portion of his speech last night. He's talking about the new Able Danger officer. Somebody else that nobody knows who can verify all this.

Sound bite of Rep. Curt Weldon: Mr. Speaker, I met with another Able Danger official. I was not aware of this official's knowledge because he doesn't live in the beltway. This official, Mr. Speaker, has impeccable credentials. I can't reveal his name today. I will to any member of this body, any colleagues who want to come to me, I'll tell you privately who this official is. And you will agree with me when I tell you his name, he has impeccable credentials. This official yesterday, Mr. Speaker, in a meeting in my office, told me that he has never been talked to by the Pentagon, he's never been talked to by the Defense Intelligence Agency in their supposed investigation, he's never been talked to by the 9-11 Commission staff in their investigation. Yet this official had a leadership position in Able Danger. This official told me that there's a separate cache of information collected from over 20 federal agencies in 99 and 2000 on Able Danger that still may exist. Now the Pentagon has told us that all of this material was destroyed.

RL: And in this new packet of information, is evidence apparently that Mohammad Atta's identity once again can be proved  to have been known one full year prior to 9-11.

Commercial break.

RL: OK, 2 more Curt Weldon bites from his speech last night on the floor of the House, this one features him pounding on the podium as he gets really worked up.

CW: Wolf Blitzer on CNN told my staff that a Defense Dept. employee told him that Lt. Col. Shaffer was having an affair with one of my employees. How low can we go, for this Defense Dept. to ruin the reputation and the personal life of a Lt. Col. with a Bronze Star. He doesn't even know my staff. To accuse him of stealing pens when he was 15. To take away his health care benefits for his 2 kids because he's telling the truth. What do we stand for, Mr. Speaker, if not the truth. Is it more important that we be politically correct? Then I don't want to be here. I'll leave. I'll leave my post. But I'm not going to do it until we get justice for this man and for these people, that the 9-11 Commission called historically insignificant. There's something wrong inside the beltway. There's something desperately wrong when a military officer risks his life in Afghanistan time and again embedded with our troops under an assumed name with a false beard and a false identity, forward deployed with our troops, gets castigated, gets ridiculed, gets some low life scum at the Pentagon spreading malicious lies about this individual.

RL: Congressman, that's how it works. He's put some pressure on somebody's turf. Somebody who just wanted to sit there and just go along with life and not upset any apple carts. He's talking about Lt. Tony Shaffer is who he's talking about here. When I spoke to him for his interview in The Limbaugh Letter he was this agitated and you can tell that he's not going to let this go. And for all this talk about the Democrats and their culture of corruption. Let me tell you that the culture of corruption is in these career positions in places like the CIA and like the Pentagon and like the State Dept. It is obvious that there's more to 9-11 than they want us to know. It's obvious that the people who conducted the investigation into it had as their primary objective to protect people's positions of power and cast blame somewhere. You'll note that no heads have rolled, that nobody has been fired. And now this guy, Tony Shaffer and this new unnamed official who apparently everybody would know and would immediately believe is credible also can validate what the others of this unit are saying. And the 9-11 staff, the Pentagon, the DIA are not interested. There's a simple reason why they're not interested, it upsets the apple cart. They though they had this handled. And some people are so outraged and upset by it that they are coming forth and they are risking everything. Here's more pounding on the podium, our final bite from Congressman Weldon.

CW: This is not about the DIA, it's not about the CIA, it's about CYA. It's about CYA by bureaucrats in the Defense Intelligence Agency and possibly some political operatives that don't want the facts to come out about Able Danger and the information that the Able Danger team put together. And in the process they're going to destroy a man, a man who has been recognized by his country, who has a family, and who simply wants to do the right thing. Mr. Speaker, what's happening here is unacceptable, it's unimaginable, it's un-American.

RL: And it will not go away. Weldon, I guarantee you will not let this go away.

vadkins
QT Monster Blog Home

October 20, 2005

Transcript of Curt Weldon Interview on the Sean Hannity Radio Show

This is a transcription of Sean Hannity's interview of Congressman Curt Weldon on The Sean Hannity Show, a Radio Talk Show that was broadcast during the afternoon of 10/20/2005:

Rep. Curt Weldon interviewed by Sean Hannity on The Sean Hannity Radio Talk Show during the 3rd hour on Thursday, Oct. 20, 2005:

Sean Hannity: ...and now we're at a point where the people that are whistle blowers here now find themselves the subject of persecution by the government. Why is this happening, what's the latest on this? We're joined by Congressman Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania. Congressman, welcome back to the program.

Rep. Curt Weldon: Sean, it's always great to be with you, you're a great American.

SH: You're a great American my friend. You now find yourself in this unbelievable position where you have to ask for a new probe into what you are now saying has become a witch hunt by defense officials against Army Colonel Anthony Shaffer. What's going on here?

CW: There are a couple of things, Sean, that have happened just in the last day. First of all we have had another witness come forward that I talked to 2 days ago who has impeccable credibility who was not interviewed by the Pentagon, who was not interviewed by the 9-11 Commission, who was a leader in Able Danger and who told me that this whole notion of destroying data because of this 90 day window was hogwash. And furthermore that his analysis, separate from the original analysis identified Mohammad Atta before 9-11 not by photograph but by name. So now we have a whole separate supplier of data for Able Danger who's verifying that same information.

SH: Hang on a second, how many guys now have officially-these are high ranking military intelligence people that were appointed to some very dangerous work to identify terrorists in this country. How many of them are on the record of corroborating and confirming your story and what Col. Shaffer has said?

CW: 7 people including an Annapolis grad who in January will take over the command of one of our destroyers, one of the top positions that the Navy has. He has impeccable credentials. He will stake his entire career on this. Sean, this story, that there are people who are holdovers from the previous administration, and the Defense Intelligence Agency (inaudible). And we're also going to break a story that there are people on the staff on the 9-11 Commission that didn't want the 9-11 Commissioners to know the details of Able Danger as well because of the potential to embarrass those commissioners and the previous administration. This story, Sean, I predict will grow to be worse than Watergate. The American people need to have the answers. Tony Shaffer's career is being ruined. The DIA is so ridiculous that they most recently charged him with stealing pens from the government (inaudible) these pens were taken when he was 15 years old when his father worked at an embassy overseas and he admitted that he took them when he took a lie detector test to get into the service.

SH: Congressman, hang on, I need to slow you down. I sense this real frustration and anger. I share your anger here, I really do. Anthony Shaffer, Col. Shaffer has served his country admirably. He tried to warn this country about the danger we faced. He put his life on the line and these guys identified that Atta and his co-conspirators were in this country. He tried to tell the officials and he was warned to shut up and be quiet. Now there are 17 people now on record, you're saying that are corroborating his story and they've gone public. So you're basically saying that there was a potential of cover-up and that this will be proven by the 9-11 Commission and commission members because they themselves didn't want to be embarrassed regarding this issue?

CW: The commission members themselves were never briefed on Able Danger. It was commission staff who made a decision staff-wise, not to raise this up to the commissioner level. I spoke to Commissioner John Lehman again this week and he affirmed that. He encouraged me to keep pursuing this. Sean, there's a bigger story here and the attempt to silence Tony Shaffer by taking away his pay and health benefits for his 2 kids, is the most outrageous, un-American I've seen in my 19 years in Congress. From a guy who has commendations from Gen. Patrick Hughes, the former head of DIA, letters from George Tenet, the former head of the CIA. For the work he did he received the bronze star and they're going to threaten to take away health care for his 2 kids?

SH: That's part of it, but he identified Atta. He also, these other people identified Atta. We were supposed to have an investigation into this. What happened?

CW: Well, there are several committees, probably 6 different committees, who are looking at various aspects of this. And there are a number of committees just looking at the Atta issue itself. But like you said, we have 7 people who will testify under oath, that in fact they identified Atta. The bigger picture, Sean, is that we had massive information about Al Qaeda and the Brooklyn cell that was ignored. Why was it ignored? Who made the decision not to share that data? If you saw Louis Free on Meet the Press this past Sunday, the first question he took was about the 9-11 Commission and he said, let me tell you something, if I would have had that information that Able Danger had, that was actionable intelligence that would have prevented or could have prevented the attack of the airplanes on the Trade Center. That was Louis Freeh this past Sunday on Meet the Press, referring to Able Danger data.

SH: Well listen, if the purpose of the 9-11 Commission, and the only intelligent thing that came out of that thing in my view was and it was a big, colossal waste of money and time, was that they identified that there was a group of people at war with us and we didn't go to war with them and the only other thing they said that was reasonably intelligent was it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when we get attacked on American soil here again. But here we have 2 specific instances that we now know of where they have fallen down on the job of looking into the vulnerability of this country and the mistakes that were made leading up to 9-11 and this has got to be right at the top of the list. And that is that here we identified these hijackers in this country 1 year prior and yet this information was brought to the 9-11 Commission, they're ignoring this specific information. One has got to scratch their wooden heads and ask why, just like why did they ignore the fact that Bin Laden had been offered to the United States to Bill Clinton on multiple occasions, Bill Clinton acknowledged it in his own words, and they ignored that tape. I don't get this Congressman.

CW: Sean, I've got a new one for you and you can run with this one, they will also testify under oath, that Able Danger 2 weeks and 2 days before the attack on the USS Cole...

SH: Wait a wait a minute. Stop. Say that slowly.

CW: 2 weeks before the attack on the USS Cole and then again 2 days before the attack on the USS Cole, saw through their analysis that a major event was going to occur in Yemen. They told the Navy not to bring the Cole into Yemen harbor and it went in and was attacked. That information was also compiled and the analysis was done by Able Danger. That story has not been told. These people will testify to that story as well.

SH: I'm stunned, Congressman.

CW: I am also, Sean.

SH: You know, we're now at the point, the last time we went through the newest developments of this and we brought you on this program and immediately the attacks on you began. And then we brought Col. Shaffer on and others and immediately the attacks against him began. I've got to wonder if you've got 7 people corroborating all of this information, at what point are the American people going to be made aware of this. Where is the main stream media coverage of this, Congressman?

CW: If it wasn't for talk radio and The New York Times has been aggressive on this and Fox News and talk radio such as yourself. The main stream media doesn't want to get into this because they don't want to know where this one goes. A third rate burglary cover-up brought down a president when no one was killed and no money was stolen. Here we have 3000 people slaughtered and yet the main stream media doesn't want to look at it. What happened prior to that, to understand why decisions were made that kept that data from being acted upon by Louis Freeh who said Sunday on national TV that actionable intelligence could have allowed us to stop the hijackings.

SH: You know what I'd like to do, Congressman? I actually have the ability, I would like to sit down with all 7 of these guys for a national 1 hour TV special on the Fox News channel. If you can get all 7 of these guys I will tape it. This weekend, next weekend, I'll fly down to Washington. You let me know what you want me to do. This needs to be brought to the attention of the American people. We need to expose this. And we need to get some more main stream coverage. I cannot believe that if we don't learn the lessons from the past, our countrymen are going to die again.

CW: Here's our problem, the Pentagon today will not allow any of these people who work for the Pentagon, to talk to the media and they have gagged them from talking to members of Congress.

SH: Can Col. Shaffer no longer talk to us?

CW: Col. Shaffer is prohibited by his lawyer from talking. He's at great risk, he has talked to some people. He's at great risk, which is why they want to take away his pay and his health care benefits so they can hold it over his head and not allow him to talk while he's under suspension. This is not America, Sean. There's nothing here about our national security. There's no classified information. This is a story that needs to be told, that has been stopped by people in the Defense Intelligence Agency, who were in that agency, the career bureaucrats that were in that agency, when they had access to this information, and did nothing with it. They're still there, Sean. And for the life of me I can't understand why, and I said to Mr. Don Rumsfeld 10 days ago, who I support, I said, Mr. Secretary, why can't they talk in public.

SH: What did he say?

CW: He hasn't answered it to me yet. That's a question that the media needs to answer. You've been very positive with the secretary, you know him very well, you need to ask that question as I have.

SH: I will at the next opportunity I have, I promise you. Absolutely that question needs to be answered.

CW: These people will talk to you, they have nothing to gain. They will give you their story, they will give you the details. These are dedicated, you know Sean, they really believe the words, duty, honor and country. When you talk to them, you see in their eyes (inaudible) this is risking my career, but I want to do this for my country. I mean, how can faceless bureaucrats in an intelligence agency deny these brave soldiers a chance to tell the truth?

SH: It's unbelievable.

CW: This is not what America is about.

SH: Congressman, I promise you that this story is going to stay in the forefront of this audience's mind. They need to hear from you again and again, they need to hear from these 7 people. Let these people speak. Let these people tell their story. Then let the American people decide who they want to believe. Let the American people come to their own conclusions here. Let's not have this dictated by a bunch of bureaucrats.

CW: Thank you, Sean.

vadkins
QT Monster Blog Home

Curt Weldon/Transcript of the Savage Nation, a Radio Talk Show

This is a transcription of Michael Savage's interview of Congressman Curt Weldon on The Savage Nation, a Radio Talk Show that was broadcast the evening of 10/19/2005. (Here is the mp3 file of this interview (3 MB). The sound quality of this file is certainly not the best though.)

Michael Savage: Joining us is Congressman Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania. Welcome to the program.

Rep. Curt Weldon: Michael, good to be with you again.

MS: Well what's going on? Why are we not hearing about Able Danger Congressman? What happened?

CW: Well it's really getting to the point of being outrageous. I teach part-time, I'm a college teacher and professor and I told the students when they were down in Washington, you know some of the things that are happening might happen in Belarus where there's a dictator, or they might happen in Iran where Ayatollah Khomeini silences people, or it could even happen in North Korea where Kim Jong Il has total control over what the people can hear and what they can know, but it cannot happen in America. And yet here it is happening-the complete silencing of a story that the American people absolutely need to understand. In the process of not allowing the story to be told, officials of the Defense Intelligence Agency are about to absolutely ruin the career of a decorated, 23 year, military intelligence officer. They are about to not only deny him his security clearance which they've already done, but his pay and his health care benefits for his two kids.This is what America has stooped to.

MS: Wait a minute, who is behind this though? Who's doing this?

CW: I'd have to point to the Deputy Director of the DIA. They are so hellbent on silencing this guy and not letting him talk to members of Congress nor to the American people that they're doing absolutely outrageously stupid things. Michael, I've asked for the Secretary of Defense to request a formal Inspector General investigation of what they're doing to Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer. In the most recent action which they've taken which is the stripping of his security clearance, thereby ending his career, they are about to move not just to do that but to suspend him without pay.

MS: But Sandy Berger's security clearance will be restored, isn't that correct?

CW: Absolutely.Sandy Berger, who stole from the National Archives, and who lied about it and then admitted it when he got caught, is going to have his security clearance put back into place.

MS: Congressman, but you're a Congressman in the United States House of Representatives, you're the one who's been pushing the hearings. What about Arlen Specter, what's he doing about all of this?

CW: Specter has held one hearing. Right now there's a stalemate. He wants to hold a second hearing, the Pentagon is refusing to allow the witnesses to appear in a public forum.

MS: Wait, you mean the Pentagon under Donald Rumsfeld now is blocking public disclosure and discussion about Able Danger?

CW: Absolutely. And I raised this question point blank to Donald Rumsfeld about a week ago when he was before my committee. I said to him, why are you blocking military intelligence officers from simply telling the truth? He said to me, Congressman, I'll look at it and I'll get back to you. I'm still waiting for an answer. But in the meanwhile they are destroying this individual which is absolutely outrageous. Michael, let me tell you how outrageous this is. When they came up with these trumped up charges, for a reason for removing his security clearance, they said that he stole pens. He stole pens. Well Michael, the truth is that when he was 15 years old, his father was working for the State Dept. overseas, and when went for his security clearance he admitted that when he was 15 years old he took some pens from the embassy to give to other students in his class.

MS: Oh my God, this does sound like something out of the Soviet Union. Well we're in very deep trouble if the Bush administration is behind this. What are they covering up Congressman?

CW: I don't know. The only thing I can figure, Michael, is that now is information that briefing occurred in January, February and March of 2001 of Able Danger information. There are probably bureaucrats in the upper levels of the Defense Intelligence Agency who don't want to be embarrassed that they did not take appropriate action.

MS: To prevent 9-11, let's put this in context. Able Danger was a unit set up inside the Pentagon to scope out potential enemies against the state. They apparently fingered Mohammad Atta a year before 9-11, they wanted his cell broken, they tried to pass the info on to the FBI, they were blocked from doing so by lawyers within the Pentagon. That's the full story. And yet we've heard nothing about it since you started this whole deal. Let me ask you something Congressman Weldon, aside from this program, have you been black-balled by the media?

CW: Well the mainstream media never wants to pub anything that they think is going to not be their story. Now some of the more aggressive media, Fox News, and I have to add the New York Times, they've been aggressive. UPI's running a story now.

MS: I know the New York Times ran some of that, that's when we had you on the show. That was a big deal. But have they stopped paying attention to what the Pentagon is trying to do to Lt. Col. Shaffer now?

CW: But they're not pushing it. I talked to Michael Isakoff today. He's interested.

MS: Oh, because anything that could embarrass the Bush administration, a spineless whimp like Isakoff would take up. That's terrible. I'm talking about more reputable sources than Isakoff. Have they all basically given you their backside?

CW: Well I tried to let what I think is the normal process work. And I tried to be civil about this because I'm a big supporter of the military. I've been Vice Chairman of the Armed Services Committee for 19 years. But as of today, Michael, I cannot take any more of this outrageous activity. I listened to the Sunday talk shows. Tim Russert had on F. Louis Freeh, the FBI director under Clinton. The first question, Louis Freeh responded with the answer that if he would have known the information that Able Danger had, then he and the FBI would have been able to stop the terrorists hijackings. Now that's Louis Freeh on national TV on Meet the Press this past Sunday, the FBI director. This is a serious story, a story that could allow us to have a process that could have stopped 3000 people from being slaughtered. This is not the Watergate coverup of a break in of a Democrat Party headquarters. This is the deaths of 3000 people, but the Pentagon is not allowing the American people to fully understand. It's outrageous. It's absolutely outrageous.

MS: You are a US Congressman, you aren't just a caller to a talk show. You are a representative of the United States of America. How can you get this treatment?

CW: Well, let me tell you, look, they tried to embarrass George Bush in the CIA right before his election, and they tried to embarrass Porter Goss nominated to head the CIA. The bureaucracy can do what it wants because they think they're untouchable. That's why I'm on your show because your listeners as they've done in the past are going to rise up with a fury that shakes this city by the neck and says we will not take this. This is not North Korea, this is not Belarus, this is America and we deserve to have the answers, plain and simple about what happened. What we don't need to have is career military officer's career destroyed because somebody in the Defense Intelligence Agency is embarrassed that they might have some information and they fell down on the job.

MS: This is unbelievable that you should make a comparison to certain branches of our government and tyrannies and dictatorships around the world. It's chilling frankly and it makes me about much bigger pictures congressman. Are you in any danger?

CW: Well, I'm not worried about that. I've passed the point of saying I will lay back and let this thing ride out. Today and yesterday I met with another source on Able Danger, a source with impeccable credentials. And when I say impeccable, impeccable. He was the leader on the Able Danger effort. He has not been interviewed by the 9-11 Commission, nor has he been interviewed by this administration or the Defense Dept. And he has told me that in spite of what we were told, that Able Danger data was destroyed. That there's a second set of information and data that's even more comprehensive than the one that was destroyed, that he thinks may still be available. He also told me, and this he'll say on the record, that this nonsense about destroying data because it was 90 days and had to be destroyed, was never followed, that in fact the lawyers in DOD allowed them to keep this data well beyond the 90 day period and that much of that data may still be intact. (inaudible) what the Defense Dept. said in a hearing before the (inaudible) committee just over one month ago.

MS: You as a US Congressman, Mr. Weldon, don't you have any authority over the Defense Dept.? I thought that we had a government run by civilians, not run by the military.

CW: You'd think that, but you know I had to write a book last year because I couldn't get the attention of the CIA on a source on Iran. It took me 2 1/2 years to write a book to finally get the intelligence to interact with a source which they're now doing over in Europe. The fact is that we have a bureaucracy, Michael that in some cases has out (inaudible) and believes that it's above the control of the American people and the elected officials who represent the American people. As much as I hate to admit this, that's what's happening here. It is outrageous, it is outrageous what's happening to Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer. And I told you that one of the things they charged him with was to remove the security clearance because he removed pens. Well, guess what happened, Michael? Over the weekend the Defense Intelligence Agency sent 7 boxes of material to (inaudible) Lt. Col. Shaffer. And in those boxes were $500 worth of federal property. But somebody in DIA stupidly sent it to Shaffer, which is fraud against the taxpayers. And even more important than that, and that included by the way, government pens. But even more than that, there were 6 pages of classified material that somebody inadvertently in DIA sent to Tony Shaffer's lawyer. This is classified information that they're saying that he's not able to handle and yet the agency sent it to Tony Shaffer. I have copies of all 6 pages.

MS: This is right out of the ex-Soviet Union. We are now living in the equivalent of the ex-Soviet Union where people could be defamed by a governmental agency and condemned to a gulag? That's what they're trying to do to Shaffer. They're sending him to the equivalent of the gulag archipelago, which is a man without a pension, is a man without a life. Especially a man who put 21 years of service in. Congressman Weldon, will you stay with us on the Savage Nation to take a couple of calls, or do you have to go?

CW: I will, I'll stay.

MS: Stay on, I'll be right back. This is shocking.

Commercial break.

MS: We have Curt Weldon, the real deal, a real representative of the people. He's very fired up. He's saying things I've never heard a Representative say, in a way I've never heard them say it. You know why, because the time is very short. We have a very small window of opportunity to save full disclosure on Able Danger. In case you don't know what Able Danger is, you'll find out on this show as time goes on. Let's go back to our guest, Congressman Curt Weldon. Welcome back. Congressman, you shook me up when you began by saying that this is not Belarus, this is not North Korea. Do you really mean that?

CW: I absolutely do. I've been been to Belarus, I've met with (inaudible), I took both delegations to North Korea. I went to Libya, I met with Qaddafi 3 times. I know what those nations are like. And I've argued with them to open up their countries and allow people to speak out and tell the truth. And here I am in my country, the country that I love, the youngest of 9 kids, a 19 year member of the Armed Services Committee, Vice Chairman. But now I've got a military officer, a 23 year veteran who's having his life destroyed because some bureaucrats in the Defense Intelligence Agency are going to be embarrassed and no one can tell the truth about what happened before 9-11. It's outrageous and it's despicable and it's unAmerican.

MS: Well Congressman, this should be fodder for the American left, but it also should worry the conservatives in this country who want freedom and truth. I would think that you'd have a large following on this issue. But apparently you're a man like Jeremiah there. You sound like you're screaming in the desert.

CW: No that's not true. Rush Limbaugh just did a national interview in his newsletter that went to 800,000 households, the New York Times has run front page stories on this. Fox News, they're not exactly the same ideological spectrum (inaudible). The UPI, AP, now it's time for the American people. The listeners of the Savage Nation to rise up and demand that this country get back to its basic roots and tenets. Where the military who wears the uniform swears to uphold God, country and defend this nation, and do it with honor and dignity. We have a responsibility to defend the military officer. Not to allow his career and life to be destroyed. Because people within the administration, within the Defense Intelligence Agency, do not want the truth to come out about what was happening that would embarrass them. And that's exactly what's going on right now.

MS: Well I understand that the minute you leave this show, you're going to go to the floor of the House and give a very similar speech. Can we watch that on C-Span?

CW: You can, I'll be on there for 1 hour, I will lay it out in detail. I will go through in detail what's happening. I will go through the request for an independent (break in recording). What we've been told publicly by the intelligence community of the Pentagon.

MS: Congressman Weldon, the question I have for you at this time, but I don't want to keep you from going to the floor of the House because I think this is a momentous story. I think it's a momentous moment in the story, and we have very little time. But, Arlen Specter worries me on this. He seemed rather sincere when he  held the hearings, and I watched every minute of them. But is he part of the problem or part of the solution here.

CW: I think Senator Specter's part (break in transcript)

MS: it's possible in this country with the War on Terror. Am I hearing that we've lost our democracy during the War on Terror?

CW: Michael, we're hearing that programs like yours are what ignite the fires in the hearts of the people of this nation. The Savage Nation needs to ignite the outrage that all of us have over what's happening in our country. No one is above the law here. No agency bureaucrat should be able to snicker on the side and say, I can take care of this guy, I can destroy his career. I can make sure that he never speaks to the public or members of Congress. And that's what's happening. That's wrong, it's unacceptable. If the rest of the Savage Nation rise up and if they jam the switchboards of the capitol, if they jam the switchboards of their representatives, if they send their emails and letters to the Secretary of Defense demanding that we have a full explanation of the information Able Danger had. We'll get to the bottom of this. Democracy still works, but we've got to make it work against these people who do not want democracy to do what the founding fathers established when this country was born over 230 years ago.

MS: Well you're giving me the faith that perhaps talk radio, the Internet can still play a role in the wheels of democracy. You have a passion I have not heard equaled in the House of Representatives, and if this was not an issue of such grave importance, I wouldn't have asked you to come back over and over again. I think this coverup of Able Danger is far bigger than Watergate. I said that to you when you came on the show originally because in Watergate nobody died. In this coverup 3000 Americans died, it's also reshaped the entire course of American history. And the only way we can prevent another 9-11 is to make sure this kind of coverup never happens again. So the concluding question for you, Congressman Weldon is this, have the barriers between CIA and the FBI or the Defense Dept. and other spy agencies within such bureaucracies and the FBI-have those barriers now been removed?

CW: It's better than it was on September the 11th 01. We have made a lot of progress. We're still not there. But we've made progress. We need to fully understand what happened before 9-11, why we didn't take the appropriate action, what the roadblocks were and where that information is today. We could be using all of that data to further understand Al Qaeda. We need to know whether or not that's happening. But when you deny, when you pretend that it didn't happen, when you gag military officers for simply wanting to tell the truth, no one knows. It's all a big secret. It's like we're protecting someone or something. And that can't stand.

MS: Congressman, I don't want to keep you, I want you to save some of that fire for the official Congressional Record. I am so proud to have heard you on the Savage Nation. God bless you. You have millions of people behind you left right and center.

vadkins
QT Monster Blog Home

October 18, 2005

Bring It In, Part II

In my previous post, "Ok, We Brought It In, Now What?", Rep Tom DeLay was desparately searching the federal government for places to cut spending. Here are a few more suggestions from a Heritage Foundation report, " Federal Spending -- By The Numbers". If you like charts, check out this report. You will be awed and shocked by the federal spending that is going on.

Nowhere To Cut?

  • The federal government cannot account for $24.5 billion spent in 2003.
  • Federal auditors are currently examining all federal programs. Thus far, 38% of all examined programs have failed to show any positive impact on the populations they serve. Yet lawmakers appropriated $154 billion to these programs in FY 2004.
  • The Congressional Budget Office published a “Budget Options” book identifying $140 billion in potential spending cuts.
  • The Defense Department wasted $100 million on unused flight tickets and never bothered to collect refunds even though the tickets were refundable.
  • The federal government spends $23 billion annually on special interest pork projects such as grants to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame or funds to combat teenage “goth” culture in Blue Springs, Missouri.
  • Washington spends tens of billions of dollars on failed and outdated programs such as the Rural Utilities Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Economic Development Association.
  • The federal government made at least $20 billion in overpayments in 2001. Current estimates are between $40 billion and $100 billion in annual overpayments.
  • The Department of Housing and Urban Development’s $3.3 billion in overpayments in 2001 accounted for over 10% of the department’s total budget.
  • Over one recent 18-month period, Air Force and Navy personnel used government-funded credit cards to charge at least $102,400 for admission to entertainment events, $48,250 for gambling, $69,300 for cruises, and $73,950 for exotic dance clubs and prostitutes.
  • Examples of wasteful duplication include: 342 economic development programs; 130 programs serving the disabled; 130 programs serving at-risk youth; 90 early childhood development programs; 75 programs funding international education, cultural, and training exchange activities; and 72 federal programs dedicated to assuring safe water.
  • The Advanced Technology Program spends $150 million annually subsidizing private businesses, and 40% of this goes to Fortune 500 companies.
  • The Conservation Reserve program pays farmers $2 billion annually to not farm their land.
  • Washington spends $60 billion annually on corporate welfare, versus $43 billion on homeland security.
  • The Department of Agriculture spends $12 billion to $30 billion annually on farm subsidies, the vast majority of which go to agribusinesses and farmers averaging $135,000 in annual income.
  • Massive farm subsidies also go to several members of Congress, and celebrity “hobby farmers” such as David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Scottie Pippen, and former Enron CEO Ken Lay.
  • Congressional investigators were able to receive $55,000 in federal student loan funding for a fictional college they created to test the Department of Education.
  • The Army Corps of Engineers has been accused of illegally manipulating data to justify expensive but unnecessary public works projects.
  • Food stamp overpayments cost $600 million annually.
  • School lunch program abuse costs $120 million annually.
  • Veterans’ program overpayments cost $800 million annually.
  • Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) overpayments cost $9 billion annually.
  • Better tracking of student loan recipients would save $1 billion annually.
  • Preventing states from using accounting tricks to secure additional Medicaid funds would save several billion dollars annually.
  • Medicare contractors owe the federal government $7 billion.

Linda Liberty
QT Monster Blog Home

Are Republicans the Taxpayer's Friend?

I'm very discouraged by the Republican controlled legislative and executive branchs. It appears the Republicans never really wanted to reduce spending, they just didn't want to spend taxpayer money on what the Democrats wanted to spend it on. It appears the only difference between the Republicans and Democrats is merely which programs to spend taxpayer money on. Here is a great report "Federal Spending: By the Numbers" from the Heritage Foundation that shows in charts better than words can express what has happened to federal spending since the Republicans have had complete control.

But, there are always some bright lights in the darkness, Congressman Mike Pence from Indiana being one. He is head of the Republican Spending Committee (Jeb Hensarling of Texas and Jeff Flake of Arizona are also members) that suggested that spending cuts be used to offset the spending that will be needed for Katrina. Initally, their suggestion was met by derision and reports are that Pence was taken to the woodshed by the Republican leadership, but all of a sudden things started turning around and even President Bush has started talking about looking for spending cuts. Rebecca Hagelin has a good article today about his struggle. Hopefully, the Republican Party will be looking at people like him to run for President in 2008. If not, they deserve to lose because they are no longer the party of limited government, they are the party of drunken sailors or the DSP - Drunken Sailor Party.

Linda Liberty
QT Monster Blog Home

October 17, 2005

Able Danger: Curt Weldon Interviewed by Rush Limbaugh in the Limbaugh Letter

These are excerpts from the article, My Conversation with Curt Weldon, in the September 2005 issue of The Limbaugh Letter:

Rush Limbaugh describes his interview of Congressman Weldon as:

...one of the most passionate I've ever conducted.

Here is some of what Rep. Weldon (R, PA) said:

They [the media-ed.]make it almost impossible for Congress to do aggressive oversight of the bureaucracy, because they basically don't want to look at the facts. They attempt to spin things. As a result members of Congress aren't willing to stick their necks out to pursue issues like this that need to be pursued...I've now got an Annapolis graduate, a 23-year career commander of a nuclear submarine, who's come out publicly, jeopardizing his career. I've got a 22-year military intelligence officer who gave up his career to come out...

I did not take the story to the media first when I was told about Able Danger in June. I'd been working on datamining with the Army's LIWA (Land Information Warfare Assessment) facility for six years, since 1999...When I first found out about Able Danger three months ago, I went to the House floor after I investigated this. I went to two 9/11 commissioners, a Democrat and a Republican. And John Lehman told me I should pursue this publicly. He said, "Curt, if you don't, nobody else will." I went to the House floor and did a speech, and no one paid attention...Then The New York Times picked it up and it's become a national story...My goal was to get this issue brought forward, not to grandstand...So Tony Shaffer came out and said, "Congressman, I'm going public. It's going to be the end of my career as an intelligence officer, but the time is right to stand up for what's right for America." Then Scott Phillpott, a Naval Academy graduate, a stellar career in the Navy, came out and said, "I will stand until the day I die and affirm we identified Mohammed Atta in January and February of 2000..."

I talked to (Defense Undersecretary for Intelligence) Stephen Cambone yesterday, and I said, "Steve, I'm sick and tired of your (Pentagon) press person saying that there's no information. I've got ten charts." Steve said, "You've got nine charts more than I do." I said, "Then don't have your press person come out and try to discount this and lend credibility to the 9/11 Commission. If you do, I'm going to embarrass the Administration, and I'm going to embarrass you in the Pentagon..."

I think what happened was one of the 9-11 commissioners and her staff saw the potential, if this was carried out, to embarrass her personally.

I have people willing to testify-more than just the two or three than have come out. That's the advantage I have over the Pentagon. They don't know what to do, because I have more information than they have about what's going on. I have more people talking...

Rush Limbaugh: ...I though you said just a moment ago you only learned of Able Danger in June.

Rep. Weldon: But I contacted Kean because, you see, I wasn't an expert on Able Danger. I was an expert on data mining and datacollaboration. And that goes back to '99, when I was chairman of the Defense Research Committee...I started to promote the need for a national collaborative capability. In 1999 I called it NOAH, a National Operations and Analysis Hub...The CIA said, "We don't need that capability, it's not necessary." I pub language in three successive defense bills, 1999, 2000, and 2001, calling for a National Collaborative Center. The CIA continually balked...By the way, the NOAH I proposed was established by George Bush in '03, called the TTIC, the Terrorism Threat Integration Center...Today it's called the NCTC, the National Counterterrorism Center. But I never knew the details of Able Danger until three months ago, when the military intelligence officials came to me to propose a follow-on to that. I asked them to give me a copy of the chart I had given to Hadley, and that's when they told me the whole story...I offered to give Kean the basic run-up, from which he would have had the ability to do when I've been doing for the past few weeks...I uncovered more information about al Qaeda linkages in ten days than they did with 100 staffers in two years...

The 9/11 Commission's spin that "we weren't gold" is B.S. They could have done what I've done in ten days, with basically myself and one staffer going back and making all the connections, identifying the private contractors working with the intelligence community, using my networks. I offered all of that to the 9/11 Commission. I offered to open the door, as did Tony Shaffer, as did Scott Phillpott, and they rejected it...I can only assume they rejected it either because they were incompetent or because they had an agenda...This has not come out yet, but I think they were monitoring mosques in America, and that's how they were getting people to take photographs and identify associations. I don't think anyone wants that to come out...Tim Roemer arrogantly say, "How could they have had a photograph of Atta? He didn't even arrive here until 2001 or so." The fact is, as you saw in The New York Times, the contractor said, "We bought that material from a California-based woman who gave us the photograph of Atta." The 9/11 Commission did not even pursue the alternative ways of identifying Atta besides the normal government means...There are two things at play. One, I think Clinton Administration holdovers do not want this story to be told. Two, I think career bureaucrats within the Defense Intelligence Agency do not want it to come out publicly that in '99, 2000, and 2001 they were using sophisticated data mining techniques...

Rush Limbaugh: Let me ask you about Sandy Berger. Is there any connection...

Rep. Weldon: I have no idea. But if the Clinton Administration had come up with the level of information I gave to Steve Hadley after 9/11, it's almost certain it would have gone to Sandy Berger before 9/11. And it's a guarantee that the Clinton policy of the firewalls is what caused the Special Forces lawyers to tell the Military Intelligence folks, "You cannot communicate with the FBI..." we have the FBI person who will publicly testify that she actually was the one-and actually had the paperwork, and our inspector has already talked to this person and she's verified to his staff-who set up FBI meetings three times that were canceled at the last minute for this specific purpose in September 2000...this needs to be fully and completely investigated. This is a scandal far worse than Watergate, because 3,000 people were slaughtered. I can't believe the cavalier attitude...

And let me tell you this: Jamie called my office when this story first broke, and I've never met the woman in my life. She called me from her vacation in Massachusetts. My chief of staff calls me in Pennsylvania and says, "You won't believe who just called here: Jamie Gorelick herself. She wants you to call her back." I said, "I'm not calling her back, you call her back, I'm tied up." He called her back, and she said, "I just want the Congressman to know I'm getting all kinds of emails. I did nothing wrong." Now, why would Jamie Gorelick call me...

Bill Cohen, Secretary of Defense under Bill Clinton, in a recent interview with Wolf Blitzer, said it was an extremely hard situation knowing the Clinton Administration did not allow agencies to talk to each other. Cohen acknowledge this...Cohen acknowledged that could have been a major reason why this problem occurred-which it was. But I don't think those Special Forces lawyers were acting on their own. I actually think there was consultation, either with the White House lawyers or with the Justice Department lawyers, which would have involved Jamie Gorelick directly...

Rush Limbaugh: ...my impression is, and I hope I'm wrong, that the Bush Administration doesn't want to go there either.

Rep. Weldon: I think they just don't know what they want. And that's part of the problem. Cambone said to me recently when he came into my office, "To be honest with you, Congressman, I don't know anything about this program at all. You know much more than I do..." It's a question whether the Republican leadership has the guts and the backbone to stand up and do the kind of oversight investigation that's necessary...

There are two fundamental questions. The first is, Who made the ultimate decision and why, to stop the military intelligence officers in September of '03, from bringing in the FBI to brief them? We have all the people who will verify that story, from the FBI itself to a number of military intelligence officers. The second questions is, How could and why would the 9/11 Commission-a commission chartered by the Congress and the President, given assets involving hundreds of staffers-not fully investigate a top-secret military program that was specifically designed to look at al Qaeda for two years? How could you not talk with them? How could the commissioners never be briefed? I'm convinced, Rush, the commissioners were never briefed on Able Danger. I think it was suppressed at the staff level. That's the question that has to be answered.

I was a fire chief. I represent all the firefighters in America...One of my best friends, Ray Downing, the chief of all rescue for the New york City Fire Department, was killed when the first tower came down. 343 firefighters were killed there. And for the past four years, I've had it in my mind that I should have done more. I should not have let the bureaucracy of the CIA back me down from establishing this data mining capability that the military had perfected. I did, and people died...if it means it's costing me the chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee, so be it. This is not about whether or not I can move up the chain; I'm doing my job, this is what's important...

They're scrambling to find out what happened, because nobody else has done their research. Cambone doesn't know who to talk to...

vadkins
QT Monster Blog Home

Louis Freeh/Able Danger - Transcript of Meet The Press Interview

As I note in my previous post, Louis Freeh was on Meet The Press with Tim Russert this morning. The Intelligence Summit has a video clip of the interview.  During this interview, Mr. Freeh offers some comments concerning Able Danger. Here is a transcript of Mr. Freeh's Able Danger remarks (beginning 16 minutes and 15 seconds into the interview):

Louis Freeh: No I disagree with that. And you know, while we're on the subject of the 9-11 Commission, I'm very interested and I know the country is in the Able Danger report. We have now very honorable military officers telling the United States, Tim, that in 2000 not only had Mohammad Atta been identified, by photo and name, but was earmarked as an Al Qaeda operative in the United States. Apparently this information was brought to the 9-11 Commission prior to their report, but there's no reference to it. That's the kind of tactical intelligence that would make a difference in stopping the hijacking, not the strategic intelligence, the stuff that comes out of um, like water out of a fire hydrant and then in hindsight, you say, well you missed these three molecules of water. I think we're very interested in what the 9-11 Commission didn't do with respect to Able Danger.

vadkins
QT Monster Blog Home

Louis Freeh/Meet The Press/Able Danger

The Intelligence Summit has a video clip from Meet the Press this morning. This is the video of Tim Russert's interview of Louis Freeh. During this interview, Mr. Freeh offers some comments concerning Able Danger. I have transcribed this segment of the interview here. This updated list of Able Danger videos is updated to include a link to this Louis Freeh/MTP interview: